//

Where Would You Eat? Fast-Casual Dining vs. On-Demand Delivery

Where Would You Eat? Fast-Casual Dining vs. On-Demand Delivery

Julia Eisenberg

May 10, 2017

Share It

As the average consumer has become busier than ever, dining out and ordering in have quickly become a new norm. We dug into to this change in routines, examining growing segments of fast-casual restaurants and on-demand food delivery services.

In our latest research report, we examine why consumers choose fast-casual over delivery and vice versa, what a typical customer looks like for each segment, and what diners expect from each type of experience.

One unique finding is that these two seemingly competing dining options in fact have opportunity to peacefully co-exist – or even work together. At the end of the day, hungry consumers just want options, both for the choice of food and for how it gets to them. In some instances, consumers use a delivery service to bring them food from a quick-service restaurant. Joining together means that fast-casual and on-demand delivery have opportunities to partner and grow.

To learn more about the study and the findings, download the complete research report Brand Wars: Fast-Casual Dining vs. On-Demand Delivery.

Julia Eisenberg

Vice President, Insights

I love a great story – numbers are nice, but nothing is more compelling than hearing directly from your consumers.

iModerate’s online qualitative interviews have been enormously helpful to us during the concept testing phase of research. iModerate provides us with invaluable feedback from a nationally representative group of Americans within a very short time frame. Not only do we get this data quickly, but it is also high quality. iModerate’s moderators are skilled at asking questions that yield useful responses. iModerate reports provide information that’s more than interesting, it’s actionable.

Sara Bamossy, Senior Strategic Planner, Saatchi & Saatchi LA